Good afternoon, readers of greatness. As the NFL took last week off, so too did the WAQ. But fear not, we are back and better than ever, previewing the big game. Obviously the Steelers are the big favorites. As I type, the current line is Steelers (-7). Personally I like the Cardinals money line, but [...]
Filed under: WAQ | Tagged: WAQ | 44 Comments »
Good Wednesday everyone. After reading Intern CRM’s (I refuse to call him Cousins of Ron Mexico) thrashing Gregg Easterbrook (or, if he doesn’t have it posted by the time this runs, insert “sneak peeking”) , I was a little hesitant to do a WAQ today. But since I’m impervious to criticism, I decided what the [...]
Filed under: WAQ | Tagged: WAQ | 19 Comments »
The word of the day in the NFL is parity. In the NFC, just two teams have clinched playoff berths, and one of those is 8-6 Arizona, who benefits from being in the worst division of all time. The Giants, who started out 11-1, can go into the playoffs as a Wild Card team [Edit: [...]
Filed under: WAQ | Tagged: WAQ | 19 Comments »
Try finding a safe for work picture that is hump day related. It’s impossible.
One of my favorite features on football telecasts is on Sunday Night Football when the starting lineups are announced and the players say what colleges they go to. Normally I have a casual interest in hearing where NFL players went to school, [...]
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: WAQ | 55 Comments »
Well balls. My whole post this week was going to revolve around Myron Rolle, and how The NCAA might finally be getting smart, and how good athletes and good students don’t have to be mutually exclusive. Then I read TMQ this week. Shit. Ah, the hell with it.
Filed under: WAQ | Tagged: WAQ | 19 Comments »
WAQ (hopefully) will be the Wednesday edition of Nothing to Click Here. Either that, or it will be in addition to NTCH. Will this be like TMQ over at ESPN? Yes and no. Like TMQ, I’ll be straying from sports, but unlike TMQ, it will only be once or twice per column, rather than about [...]
Filed under: WAQ | Tagged: WAQ | 25 Comments »
